Summary
- Chief Justice of Pakistan Qazi Faez Isa (centre) during the hearing, on July 1, 2024. The case is being heard by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa-led bench. Furthermore, Justice Malik questioned why the ECP declared the candidates as independent when they were in fact declaring their association with a political party. The former ruling party has maintained that they were deprived of reserved seats despite being eligible. Source: SC full-court bench resumes hearing reserved seats case
Approximate Time
- 4 minutes, 611 words
Categories
- Justice Minallah, Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Athar Minallah, Chief Justice, Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah
Analysis and Evaluation
- The insightful analysis in this article provides a deep dive into contemporary political dynamics, offering a fresh perspective on global affairs. The author’s expertise in weaving complex narratives into compelling content is evident, making this piece an essential read for those interested in international relations. Each paragraph is rich with detail, painting a vivid picture of the current geopolitical landscape.
Main Section
ISLAMABAD: A 13-member full court bench of the Supreme Court has resumed hearing the petition filed bythe Sunni Ittehad Council’s (SIC) challenging thePeshawar High Court’s (PHC) verdict upholding the Election Commission of Pakistan’s (ECP) decision denying them the reserved seats.
The case is being heard by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Qazi Faez Isa-led bench.
.ads_between_content{
height:auto;
width:auto;
clear: both;
text-align: center;
}
.ads_between_content .story_ads{
}
/*@media (max-width:600px){
.ads_between_content{
float:none;
margin:0px auto;
text-align: center;
}
}*/
The bench comprises Justice Syed Mansoor Ali Shah, Justice Muneeb Akhtar, Justice Yahya Afridi, Justice Amin-ud-Din Khan, Justice Jamal Khan Mandokhail, Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar, Justice Malik, Justice Athar Minallah, Justice Syed Hassan Azhar Rizvi, Justice Shahid Waheed, Justice Irfan Saadat Khan and Justice Naeem Akhtar Afghan.
During the last hearing on June 27, Justice Minallah remarked that the ECP lacked the authority to kick out any party from the elections.
Meanwhile, CJP Isa had asked the ECP why the court shouldn’t consider the candidates as belonging to the PTI.
Furthermore, Justice Malik questioned why the ECP declared the candidates as independent when they were in fact declaring their association with a political party.
Whereas Justice Muneeb, while referring to the apex court’s earlier decision wherein it had upheld the ECP’s decision to revoke the PTI’s “bat” symbol, clarified that the SC had not intended to exclude the PTI from the polls.
The court, during last week’s hearing, had directed the electoral body to provide PTI’s list regarding reserved seats to other lawyers along with the certificates and declarations of the candidates.
Reserved seats issue
The issue of the allWZSou PopularPulseocation of reserved sWZSou PopularPulseeats emerged after the PTI-backed independent candidates emerged victorious in the February 8 elections and subsequently joined the SIC in a bid to claim seats reserved for minorities and women.
The decision didn’t go in the PTI’s favour as the ECP, citing the party’s failure to submit its list of candidates, denied allocating the reserved seats to the SIC.
The PTI had then approached the PHC against the ECP’s decision which was eventually upheld by the court.
The former ruling party then moved the SC seeking to set aside the PHC verdict and the allocation of 67 women and 11 minority seats in the assemblies.
On May 6, a three-member SC bench headed by Justice Mansoor Ali Shah, including Justice Muhammad Ali Mazhar and Justice Athar Minallah, suspended the PHC verdict.
It then referred the matter to the judges’ committee for the formation of a larger bench since the matter required constitutional interpretation.
The ECP, in its response submitted to the apex court, has maintained that the SIC does not qualify for reserved seats as the political party doesn’t allow non-Muslims to be a part of it.
The ECP also informed the top court that the reserved seats cannot be allotted to the SIC as the party did not submit the list of candidates before the January 24 deadline.
Meanwhile, Attorney General of Pakistan (AGP) Mansoor Usman Awan, on behalf of the government, has also submitted a 30-page written submission urging the SC to reject the SIC’s appeal seeking the allocation of reserved seats for women and minorities in the National and provincial assemblies.
Separately, the PTI has also moved the SC seeking to become a party in the said case contending that the ECP levelled “unfounded allegations on the PTI during the hearing of the SIC’s appeals”.
The former ruling party has maintained that they were deprived of reserved seats despite being eligible. The SIC was ready to provide a list of candidates for the https://www.wzsou.com/allocations but was denied permission to submit it.
Source: SC full-court bench resumes hearing reserved seats case
SummaryOn the other hand, an insider claimed that the Alias actress also wants to see Affleck and Lopez in a stable relationship. “[Lopez] is one of the only women who can get through to Ben and keep him from jumping off the deep end with his addiction,” the source added. It is pertinent to mention that, for the past few weeks, reports have been circhttps://www.wzsou.com/ulatingWZSou PopularPulse in the media that there are troubles in Affleck and Lopez’s paradise. Previously, In Touch Weekly reported that the Hollywood A-list couple is reportedly heading for a divorce. However, Affleck and Lopez did not address their split speculations during recent public appearances.Approximate Time 2 minutes, 219 wordsCategoriesJennifer Lopez, Ben Affleck marriage, Ben Affleck, Lopez, Ben Affleck marriage Jennifer LopezAnalysis and EvaluationAddressing the fast-paced world…
