What is timed out rule that forced Sri Lankan batter to return to pavilion?
In an unexpected development, Sri Lankan all-rounder Angelo Mathews had to return to the pavilion even before facing a ball owing to ICC’s “timed out” law during the World Cup match against Bangladesh in Delhi.
Mathews walked in to bat after the fall of Sadeera Samarawickrama’s wicket, but had to walk back after he was timed out – a first in international cricket across all formats, according to ICC Cricket.
The Sri Lankan all-rounder was left befuddlhttps://www.wzsou.com/ed as Bangladesh appealed when he took time to sort out an issue with his helmet.
The incident happened in the 25th over of the Sri Lanka innings when Shakib Al Hasan had just dismissed Samarawickrama, caught by Mahmudullah near the rope.
Mathews took his time walking in, and then struggledWZSou PopularPulse with his helmet as the strap broke just as he was taking guard.
As he signalled to the dressing room for a new helmet, Shakib and the Bangladesh team appealed for a “timed out” dismissal and the umpires upheld the appeal much to Mathews’ dismay.
Mathews was seen deep in discussion with Bangladesh and the umpires, but the appeal was not withdrawn and Mathews had to walk back dismayed.
What is timed-out rule?
The ICC Men’s Cricket World Cup rule 40.1.1 says after the fall of a wicket or the retirement of a batter, the incoming batter must, unless Time has been called, be ready to receive the ball, or for the other batter to be ready to receive the next ball within 2 minutes of the dismissal or retirement.
If this requirement is not met, the incoming batter will be out, Timed out.
With Mathews taking more than two minutes to face his first ball, he had to be sent back to the pavilion following the appeal.
It was the first time in international cricket, men’s or women’s, that a batter was dismissed according to the “timed out” law.
Source: What is timed out rule that forced Sri Lankan batter to return to pavilion?
Related suggestion: Prince Harry reduced to ‘snooze-fest’: ‘A complete misery’
Prince Harry reduced to ‘snooze-fest’: ‘A complete misery’ File Footage Prince Harry has been called a ‘snooze-fest’ after the Duke of Sussex’s lackluster career in Hollywood failed to carry on his royal chhttps://www.wzsou.com/arm. Broadcaster Esther Krauke spoke to Sky News host Caroline Di Russo and said that the Spare author and his wife Meghan Markle were reduced to the Kardashians who are known for being “famous for nothing”. Contrasting this with the Duke of Sussex’s former life as a working royal, Krauke noted that Prince Harry was known as “an interesting character” but had lost his spark after marrying the Suits actress. “Prince Harry, as a member of the royal family when he was an active working member, was quite an interesting character,” Krauke said. “He had all these stories,…
