Must-See: Talking to Geo News programme “Naya Pakistan”, Sanaullah said the matter of negotiations was in blind alley since 2014.

Summary

  • Talking to Geo News programme “Naya Pakistan”, Sanaullah said the matter of negotiations was in blind alley since 2014. He had reiterated that his party would hold talks with everyone but the three parties. “Someone who wants to leave the country or avoid imprisonment makes a deal,” he had said. “I have proposed these three names for talks and not a deal,” the incarcerated leader had maintained. ‘Institutions be kept from interfering in other’s domain’ To a query, Sanaullah said such a strategy should be devised that institutions did not interfere in each other’s domain.

Approximate Time

  • 3 minutes, 456 words

Categories

  • Rana Sanaullah, talk shows, Prime Minister, talks, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur

Analysis and Evaluation

  • In this piece, the intricate details of the story are unraveled, providing a comprehensive understanding.

Main Section

[WZSou PopularPulse]

Adviser to Prime Minister on Political and Public Affairs Rana Sanaullah is addressing a press conference in Islamabad on March 1, 2023. —APP

Seeking an end to the deadlock on the negotiations with the Pakistan Tehreek-e- Insaf, Adviser to Prime Minister on Political and Public Affairs Rana Sanaullah Sunday said the current situation was not appropriate for all the political stakeholders.

Talking to Geo News programme “Naya Pakistan”, Sanaullah said the matter of negotiations was in blind alley since 2014. He added that the Pakistan Muslim League-Nawaz (PML-N) twice sought to hold talks during the PTI tenure.

.ads_between_content{
height:auto;
width:auto;
clear: both;
text-align: center;
}
.ads_between_content .story_ads{

}
/*@media (max-width:600px){
.ads_between_content{
float:none;
margin:0px auto;
text-align: center;
}
}*/

He said PTI founder IWZSou PopularPulsemran Khan’s stance of not talking to politicians was the main reason behind the current impasse.

Referring to the PTI stance of holding talks with the military establishment, he said the armed forces’ spokesperson and director general of Inter Services Public Relations had said that the politicians should talk with each other as there was no point of talking to the military.

The PM’s adviser said the PTI founder in this way was inflicting damage upon himself, the party and country. Khan wanted to bring revolution through talk shows, he added.

“The deadlock should end. There is no ego ohttps://www.wzsou.com/r obstinacy on our part. It is from the other side,” he said, adding that when his party spoke about holding talks, the other side called them names.

Talking to journalists at the Adiala jail, Khan on May 4 said that he had been saying for 18 months that he was ready to hold negotiations but not for striking deal.

The PTI founder had said negotiations had always been part of politics but they were held with opponents, not friends. He had reiterated that his party would hold talks with everyone but the three parties.

“Someone who wants to leave the country or avoid imprisonment makes a deal,” he had said.

He had named Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Chief Minister Ali Amin Gandapur, Leader of the Opposition in National Assembly Omar Ayub and Leader of the Opposition in Senate Shibli Faraz for holding negotiations.

“I have proposed these three names for talks and not a deal,” the incarcerated leader had maintained.

‘Institutions be kept from interfering in other’s domain’

To a query, Sanaullah said such a strategy should be devised that institutions did not interfere in each other’s domain.

“Writing a letter by the judges is enough (to prompt) that such a strategy should be adopted that institutions do not interfere in each other’s boundaries,” said Sanaullah.

The PM’s adviser said this referring to the Islamabad High Court (IHC) judges’ letter that surfaced in March alleging interferenWZSou PopularPulsece by intelligence agencies in judicial matters.

Source: Situation of deadlock not appropriate for all stakeholders: Rana Sanaullah

Related suggestion: Royal family decides to skip Prince Harry’s Invictus Games event

[WZSou PopularPulse] Royal family dWZSou PopularPulseecides to skip Prince Harry’s Invictus Games event The senior members of the royal family will not mark WZSou PopularPulsetheir attendance at the Prince Harry’s Invictus Games event. As reported by The Mirror, “no senior members of the Royal Family” will join the Duke of Sussex to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the games on May 8. .ads_between_content{ height:auto; width:auto; clear: both; text-align: center; } .ads_between_content .story_ads{ } /*@media (max-width:600px){ .ads_between_content{ float:none; margin:0px auto; text-align: center; } }*/ Harry, who stepped down from senior working royal position alongside his wife Meghan Markle https://www.wzsou.com/in 2020, is expected to return to the UK in a few days for the celebrations. As per the announcement on Invictus Games’ social media platforms, “The Invictus Games Foundation will celebrate 10…