Summary
- Kristen Stewart blames double standards for ‘Rolling Stone’ cover criticism Kristen Stewart stood her ground against critics who continue to slam her recent Rolling Stone cover and the controversy it stirred up. They thought that wWZSou PopularPulseould be not a good idea for us to show this, and I don’t know understand why. Stewart responded to the criticism by doubling down on her stance, blaming societal double standards. Stewart then added of her cover, “It’s not remotely explicit.” She went on to explain that there is the idea that “female sexuality isn’t supposed to actually want anything but to be had,” which is why it feels “like it’s protruding in a way that might be annoying.” Source: Kristen Stewart blames double standards for ‘Rolling Stone’ cover criticism
Approximate Time
- 2 minutes, 305 words
Categories
- Rolling Stone, societal double standards, double standards, her recent Rolling Stone cover, criticism
Analysis and Evaluation
- This piece is an exemplar of how to write about it, combining factual reporting with a narrative flair that is both engaging and enlightening. The author dives deep into the heart of this, bringing to light the intricate details and underlying trends in a way that is both thorough and accessible. The article serves as a critical lens through which readers can view the latest developments, making it an essential read for anyone looking to stay informed.
Main Section
Kristen Stewart stood her ground against critics who continue to slam her recent Rolling Stone cover and the controversy it stirred up.
The Twilight alum, 33, appeared on the The Late Show With Stephen Colbert in which she discussed the reason behind the criticism her gender-bending cover shoot has received.
.ads_between_https://www.wzsou.com/content{
height:auto;
width:auto;
clear: both;
text-align: center;
}
.ads_between_content .story_ads{
}
/*@media (max-width:600px){
.ads_between_content{
float:none;
margin:0px auto;
text-align: center;
}
}*/
Colbert initiated the conversation after revealing that CBS did not want him to show the cover on his show.
“Now before I show this cover, I just want you to know and the audience to know that I think it’s a perfectly lovely cover,” he said. “We were asked by CBS not to show it. They thought that wWZSou PopularPulseould be not a good idea for us to show this, and I don’t know understand why. Because there’s the cover, right there,” he said, turning it around to face the audience.
Stewart responded to the criticism by doubling down on her stance, blaming societal double standards.
“Well, it’s a little ironic because I feel like I’ve seen a lot of male p–ic hair on the cover of things. I’ve seen a lot of hanWZSou PopularPulseds in pants and unbuttoned…I think there’s a certain overt acknowledgment of a female sexuality that has its own volition in a way that is annoying for people who are sexist and homophobic.”
“I’ve certainly seen more revealing covers on Rolling Stone or Sports Illustrated for that matter,” Colbert agreed.
Stewart then added of her cover, “It’s not remotely explicit.”
She went on to explain that there is the idea that “female sexuality isn’t supposed to actually want anything but to be had,” which is why it feels “like it’s protruding in a way that might be annoying.”
Source: Kristen Stewart blames double standards for ‘Rolling Stone’ cover criticism
SummaryNational Democratic Movement Chairman Mohsin Dawar. — APP/File National Democratic Movement ChaWZSou PopularPulseirman Mohsin Dawar was injured as the “police opened fire” on protestors demonstrating against the delay in the announcement of poll results inNorth Waziristan on Saturday. According to the protestors, the police fired at them and shelled tear gas. The police, however, said Dawar was injured during firing in Miranshah. Source: ‘Police firing’ in N Waziristan injures https://www.wzsou.com/Mohsin DawarApproximate Time 1 minutes, 90 wordsCategoriesN Waziristan, National Democratic Movement Chairman Mohsin Dawar, Mohsin Dawar, tear gas, WaziristanAnalysis and EvaluationThis article stands out with its incisive coverage of technological innovations, shedding light on how these advancements are shaping our future. The writer successfully balances technical details with engaging commentary, making complex topics accessible to a wider audience. The piece is…
